Design Manager Hub
Product Design Reference
  • Welcome
  • Leadership Foundations
    • Leadership Blueprint
    • Good Managers
    • Bad Managers
    • Change Management
    • Leadership Styles
  • Managing People
    • Roles
      • Design/UX
      • Engineering
      • Product & Agile
      • Management
      • Levels
      • Soft Skills
    • Hiring
    • Onboarding
    • Culture
    • Performance Management
    • Feedback
    • Retention
    • Employee Exits
    • Managing Up
  • Meetings
    • Overview
    • One-on-Ones
    • Agile Meetings
    • Design Critiques
    • Stakeholder Meetings
    • Retrospectives
    • Workshops
    • Performance Reviews
    • All-hands
    • Skip-level Meetings
    • PIP Meetings
    • Exit Interviews
    • Public Speaking
  • Strategy
    • Overview
    • Vision & Goals
      • Product Vision
      • Goal Setting
      • Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG)
      • Product Innovation Charter (PIC)
      • Product Trio
    • Prioritisation
      • Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort (RICE)
      • ICE Scoring
      • MoSCoW
      • Impact-Effort Matrix
      • The Kano Model
    • General Analysis
      • Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
      • SWOT Analysis
      • The 5 Whys
      • The Sunk Cost Fallacy
    • Market Analysis
      • Product-Market Fit (PMF)
      • PEST Analysis
      • Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)
      • Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV)
      • 6 Forces
    • Canvases
      • Business Model Canvas
      • Value Proposition Canvas
      • Lean UX Canvas
      • UX Research Canvas
      • Product Canvas
    • Customer Insights
      • User Journey Mapping
      • Net Promoter Score (NPS)
      • Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)
      • A/B Testing
      • Funnel Analysis
      • Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD)
    • Organisational Alignment
      • McKinsey 7S
      • Weisbord's 6 Box Model
      • Balanced Scorecard
  • Process
    • Overview
    • Agile
    • Waterfall
    • Lean UX
    • Design Thinking (DT)
    • Design Sprint
    • DevOps
    • Cross-Functional Teams
    • Double Diamond
    • Reverse Double Diamond
    • GTD Methodology
    • Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD)
    • Kaizen
    • Object-Oriented UX
    • Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed (RACI)
    • Six Sigma
    • Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
  • Cognitive Toolkit
    • Overview
    • Prioritisation
      • 6 Box Framework
      • Eisenhower Matrix
      • Impact-Effort Matrix
      • The Pareto Principle
    • Problem Solving
      • First Principles Thinking
      • Systems Thinking
      • Inversion Thinking
      • Abstraction Laddering
      • Occam's Razor
      • Divergent & Convergent Thinking
    • Decision Making
      • The Map Is Not the Territory
      • The Cynefin Framework
      • Second-order Thinking
      • System 1 & System 2 Thinking
      • The Hard Choice Model
      • OODA Loop
    • Managing People
      • Skill-Will Matrix
      • The 4 Worker Types
      • The 9 Employee Types
      • Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
      • The Peter Principle
      • Dunning-Kruger Effect
      • Circle of Competence
      • Hanlon's Razor
      • Johari Window
      • The Minto Pyramid
  • Insights
    • Insightful Articles
    • Research Foundations
    • Design Roles
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Templates
    • Education
    • Conferences
    • Video Hub
    • Quotes
    • Experts
    • Software
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Cognitive Toolkit
  2. Managing People

The Peter Principle

Last updated 6 months ago

The Peter Principle is a theory that states that employees in a hierarchical organisation tend to be promoted to their level of incompetence. In other words, individuals are promoted based on their performance in their current role, but once they reach a position where their skills are no longer sufficient, they are no longer promoted.

This principle is often used to explain why some organisations seem to have a large number of incompetent managers. It suggests that these managers were promoted to their positions because they were good at their previous jobs, but once they were in a role that required different skills, they were no longer able to perform effectively.

The Peter Principle raises some important questions about promotion policies and organisational structures. It suggests that organisations should be careful about promoting employees based solely on their performance in their current role, and that they should consider other factors, such as their potential for growth and development.

Further Reading

LogoPeter principleWikipedia
LogoAre you aware of “The Peter Principle and Business”?Medium
LogoThe Peter Principle: how lazy leadership can stifle your design careerUX Collective
LogoWhy Good Employees Often Fail After Promotions : The Peter PrincipleMedium
Image by
Sketchplanations